When appellant challenges expert testimony given at trial, he must specifically identify the objectionable testimony for Court of Appeals
APPELLATE PROCEDURE United States v. Vazquez, No. 08-4044, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. Feb. 10, 2009)(Utah). Appeal of conviction for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. HELD: When an appellant challenges admissibility of expert testimony given at trial, court of appeals task is limited to considering specific testimony being challenged. Court of appeals has no obligation to review trial transcript to find occasions where expert testimony was erroneously admitted. Appellant must provide specific guidance regarding what testimony was improper. Read the opinion here. |
Comments on "When appellant challenges expert testimony given at trial, he must specifically identify the objectionable testimony for Court of Appeals"