Witness’s violation of sequestration order at suppression hearing does not require district court to discount testimony
SEARCH & SEIZURE United States v. Samuels, No. 05-5186, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. Jul 9, 2007)(N.D. Oklahoma). Appeal of conviction and sentence for possessing cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(iii). HELD: District court did not err by relying on testimony of witness who violated witness sequestration in denying defendant’s suppression motion. Read the opinion here. |
Comments on "Witness’s violation of sequestration order at suppression hearing does not require district court to discount testimony"