Invited error is waived and therefore not subject to plain error review
APPEAL United States v. Teague, No. 04-2071, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. Apr. 21, 2006)(New Mexico). Appeal of condition of supervised release. HELD: Where defendant claims district court erred by imposing condition of supervised release prohibiting contact with court except through counsel, claim was not reviewable for plain error because error was waived (not forfeited) by condition being offered to court by defendant’s counsel with defendant’s agreement. Read the opinion here. |
Comments on "Invited error is waived and therefore not subject to plain error review"