Reference
  • Supreme Court
  • Home
  • Slip Opinions
  • Docket
  • Tenth Circuit
  • Home
  • Opinions (10th Cir.)
  • Opinions (Washburn Univ.)
  • Tenth Circuit and Fed. Rules Appellate Procedure
  • Docket via PACER Log-in
  • Register for PACER
  • Oral Argument Calendar
  • Related Sites
  • Federal Court Links
  • U.S. Sentencing Commission
  • Admin Office U.S. Courts
  • PACER Service Center
  • U.S. Code via LII
  • Code Federal Regs via LII
  • Federal Rules Crim Procedure via LII
  • Federal Rules of Evidence via LII
  • U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
  • GPO Access
  • Thomas U.S. Congress
  • Federal Criminal Jury Instructions
  • Oklahoma Public Legal Research System
Other Useful Links
  • How Appealing
  • SCOTUS Blog
  • Jurist
  • Scribes
  • Legal Writing Institute
  • Wayne Schiess's
    legal-writing blog
  • Legal Writing Prof Blog
  • Legal Research & Writing
  • Council of Appellate
    Staff Attys
  • Second Opinions
    (2nd Circuit)
  • Sixth Circuit Law
    (6th Circuit)
  • Criminal Appeal
    (9th Circuit)
  • Rocky Mtn Appellate Blog
    (10th Circuit)
  • Abstract Appeal
    (11th Circuit)
  • Sentencing Law & Policy
  • On Appeal
  • Inter-Alia
    (Legal Research)
  • Appellate Law & Practice
  • Jim Calloway's Law Practice Tips
  • LegalWikiPro
  • Space Law Station
  • Space Law Probe
  • New Mexico Labor & Employment Law
  • Bag and Baggage
  • Terra Extraneus
  • The Rocket Docket

Navigate

  • Home
  • Author's Profile
  • Contact

Notice

    January 5, 2009.
    I'm back after a long absence from blogging. In the next few days I will be posting new summaries. Unfortunately, there will be a gap in coverage between June 26th and December 31st, 2008.
    - Russ

Public Service


Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.

Visit

  • The liberal alternative to Drudge.
  • SomaFM independent internet radio

Credits

  • Powered by Blogger

  • Site Meter

Thursday, July 07, 2005

Counterfeit trademark test applies to deception of public in general, not just direct purchasers of counterfeit goods

STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION/SENTENCING
United States v. Foote,
No. 03-3263, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. Jul. 6, 2005)(Kansas).

Appeal of conviction and sentence for conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320 and 371.

HELD:

(1) Statute defining counterfeit trademark as mark likely “to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive,” is not restricted to instances in which direct purchasers are confused or deceived by counterfeit goods, but also applies to members of public in general who might be confused, mistaken, or deceived should they encounter the counterfeit goods in post-sale context.

(2) Federal catchall statute of limitations period of five years applies to prosecutions under Counterfeit Trademark Act, not limitations period provided under any analogous state law statute.

(3) Where district court dismissed all substantive trafficking counts other than one count involving single counterfeit Mont Blanc pen, and all conduct comprising that offense occurred before effective date of 2000 sentencing guidelines which provided harsher penalties, district court erroneously applied 2000 guidelines based on conspiracy-related conduct contained in dismissed counts that occurred after 2000 guidelines became effective.

Read the opinion here.

posted by Russ at 9:03 AM


Comments on "Counterfeit trademark test applies to deception of public in general, not just direct purchasers of counterfeit goods"

 

post a comment